Ive set the f-stop to F/2.8, to sharpen up the stars a bit. Some noteworthy targets to try. Wonderful image quality, lots of detail, contrasty, subject separation, fast and accurate AF, bright viewfinder, solid construction, unobtrusive in use, No weather sealing, makes all my other lenses look poor (even the 'L' zooms that, when I first got them, imagined could hardly be improved on). - in my subjects' skin. Sony has added a full-frame 50mm F1.4 prime to its premium 'GM' range of E-mount lenses. At a local amateur soccer game using the 135 f/2 the action was almost always too close, or too far away. But I hardly used it in the 30+ years. Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. It's just "girl" in front of blurriness.#2: Plants on a pond.It's okay. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. Well, after lugging that lens around for years, I'm experimenting with adding the 135L back to my kit. I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. I had of course heard that this lens is supposed to be very sharp, but I had never before had such a full blown "wow" experience when reviewing the sharpness of a lens. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. While some people LOVE the bokeh circles (first photo), others hate them and consider them a distraction.The 50mm f/1.8 is hardly a lens to talk about. If you can tolerate vignetting, there are many normal 35mm lenses that are great wide open. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. I can only guarantee that the TSAPO65Q would work very well. (purchased for $970), reviewed March 17th, 2011 But this lens changed my mind. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. Canon 135 mm is really E X T R A O R D I N A R Y lens. Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? I have just acquired my astrophotography set up thanks to all your videos and doing some research. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. We always expect to see some drop in performance (particularly corner sharpness) when we move from testing on a sub-frame to a full-frame camera, but the 135mm f/2L turned in a really remarkable performance even at full-frame. The focuser adjustment rotates roughly 270 degrees, meaning fine-tuning on a bright star is more precise. I thought I would miss shooting at 200mm, but 135mm is long enough for most portraits and gives a decent amount of compression. Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. When i just judge by the indicator line as i click through, it seems like its 19 that gets skipped wondering if there is anything more definite? The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. Deep-sky astrophotography is often associated with a camera and telescope, but the truth is there are a lot of great camera lenses for astrophotography out there. Show some humility and don't troll. I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. I am telling them - don't! What is it like shooting with one today? This free website's biggest source of support is when you use these links, especially these directly to it at Adorama or at Amazon, when you get anything, regardless of the country in which you live. +1 for the 135mm lens. It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! Im a newbie at astro.. and photography in general really! f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. My questions, for deep sky pics, should I get the 135mm lens or the RedCat 51 APO 250mm f/4.9 which you mentioned here as well? The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. Every different lens design has different "bokeh" even when the lenses are by specs same, like Canon 135mm f/2 vs Samyang 135mm f/2 are both same, but both render differently, even when both have same DOF. reviewed August 2nd, 2017 Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. But the Rokinon f/2 version fits into a different market. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. The lens is available on eBay for around $200. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! If you want autofocus and great value for money, buy the Canon 135mm, as it has almost the image quality of the Samyang, and you can get it for under $1,000 new. Big F-value.Light. In general, prime telephotos should outperform zooms. But she might as well be in front of a green screen. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. A promising start, no doubt, but not a master yet! I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. Only con I can think of, and that may be a big one depending on how you plan to use the lens is the lack of weather sealing. I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). If so, which one? I cant seem to find this documented anywhere. From far to near, the AF is instantaneous. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. for sample photos and video tour, This is simply the best Canon prime lens that I have tested. To remedy this, I reduced the star size in post, and I started shooting at F/4 to really tighten things up. Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. If you want the best value possible for your money, and can survive without autofocus, buy the Samyang. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. From my purchase research, I found a consensus that stopping down optimizes sharpness but the diaphragm will make nine diffraction spikes when stopped down. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. The shot of the cat could certainly be improved through cropping, though. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. Most of the available 135mm F2 lenses have a very short minimum focusing distance in relation to the focal length, creating a magnification ratio of around 0.2 - 0.25. This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. Creamy smooth bokeh. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. I love the lens for my modified Sony a6000! This is one of my all time favourites. http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. PRICE. On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. Click on following link to view images I got many great shots from this lens but also missed ton of shots due manual focus only. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. Sharp wide open, wonderful bokeh, fast AF in dark conditions. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. We think it rises to the challenge. Agreed. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135. Theres no image stabilization on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 either, but thats a non-issue for amateur astrophotographers. If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. The North America Nebula captured using the 135mm lens with a clip-in Ha filter. Neutral yet very nice colours. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? Great reach for street shots. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure.
Heart Touching Birthday Wishes For Girlfriend Long Distance,
Where To Find Pike In Sneaky Sasquatch,
Des Moines Wa Basketball League,
Andrew Thomas Contract,
Will A Sheet Of Drywall Fit In A Ford Escape,
Articles C
